The basic challenge to the Nepalese market for the Adoptation of IFRS is
the hurdle which comes up with the new impairment models under IFRS 9,
mainly to the financial institutions due to huge amount of data and lack
of in-built models for the reliable projection and forecast of
financial covenants. whatever may be the difficulties, It could not be
used as an excuse for the reasonable and consistent application of
impairment model as outlined by IFRS 9, Hence the initiation from market
leaders is vital for the the timely adoptation of global standard.
Here is the basic introductory coverage for the impairment model
outlined under IFRS 9:
The standard outlines a ‘three-stage’ model (‘general model’) for
impairment based on changes in credit quality since initial recognition:
Stage 1
It includes financial instruments that have not had a significant
increase in credit risk since initial recognition or that have low
credit risk at the reporting date. For these assets, 12-month expected
credit losses (‘ECL’) are recognised and interest revenue is calculated
on the gross carrying amount of the asset (that is, without deduction
for credit allowance). 12-month ECL are the expected credit losses that
result from default events that are possible within 12 months after the
reporting date. It is not the expected cash shortfalls over the 12-month
period but the entire credit loss on an asset weighted by the
probability that the loss will occur in the next 12 months..
Stage 2
It includes financial instruments that have had a significant increase
in credit risk since initial recognition (unless they have low credit
risk at the reporting date) but that do not have objective evidence of
impairment. For these assets, lifetime ECL are recognised, but interest
revenue is still calculated on the gross carrying amount of the asset.
Lifetime ECL are the expected credit losses that result from all
possible default events over the expected life of the financial
instrument. Expected credit losses are the weighted average credit
losses with the probability of default (‘PD’) as the weight.
Stage 3
It includes financial assets that have objective evidence of impairment
at the reporting date. For these assets, lifetime ECL are recognised and
interest revenue is calculated on the net carrying amount (that is, net
of credit allowance). The standard requires management, when
determining whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has
increased significantly, to consider reasonable and supportable
information available, in order to compare the risk of a default
occurring at the reporting date with the risk of a default occurring at
initial recognition of the financial instrument.
And, the definition of default should be identified, that is consistent
with the definition used for internal risk management purposes for the
relevant financial instrument, and it should consider qualitative
factors such as financial covenants and forecasts, wherever
appropriate.
Source: IFRS/NFRS 9,PWC Resources etc.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment